Tag: Troubleshooting


  • The Fear of Missing Out

    FOMO-driven eating comes from a scarcity mindset: this opportunity is rare and won’t come again. But many “special” foods are always available. The urge is an evolutionary leftover, a brain built to seek calorie-dense food under scarcity, and the modern food environment exploits it. The antidote: abundance thinking. There will always be more desserts, more parties. Missing this one usually costs you little. Eating from FOMO isn’t enjoyment: it’s compulsion. This companion covers the FOMO mechanism, what it looks like, reframing scarcity, and practicing abundance. (3 min read)


  • The Inflammation Connection

    Certain foods and habits form a pro-inflammatory pattern: refined carbs, added sugars, trans fats, ultra-processed foods, and excessive alcohol. Others anchor an anti-inflammatory pattern: fatty fish, leafy greens, berries, nuts, olive oil, and ginger. Chronic inflammation is linked to many conditions: metabolic dysfunction, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, joint pain. Diet is one modifiable lever. This companion covers what chronic inflammation is, foods that promote or reduce it, the bigger picture (sleep, stress, gut health), and what to do. (5 min read)


  • The Relapse Plan

    When you slip up, you’re in a vulnerable state: shame high, the what-the-hell effect looming, self-control strained. Research on if-then planning shows that naming the response in advance helps keep a setback from derailing the whole effort. Decide now: return to normal eating at the next meal, don’t compensate with restriction, don’t spiral. When the slip happens, execute the plan instead of improvising. This companion covers why you need a plan, what it includes, what a plan can and cannot do, and minimizing damage from inevitable setbacks. (4 min read)


  • The Excuse List

    Your excuses are often predictable: they show up in the same situations, wearing the same disguises. And “defenses are down” is literal: stress dampens the prefrontal machinery of deliberate choice while hyperactivating reward circuits. Writing excuses down exposes them; preparing counters in advance is well-evidenced, with a medium-to-large effect on follow-through across 94 studies. Two cautions the popular version of this technique skips: make the counter a redirection rather than a reprimand, because self-criticism after a lapse drives more eating, not less; and don’t expect it to become automatic right away. A prepared counter buys you the moment to choose;…


  • The Progress Photos

    The scale captures one dimension, and day-to-day fluctuations can obscure real progress. One small survey of weight maintainers links self-monitoring with success: the case here is for adding measures, not for abandoning the scale. Photos and measurements capture changes the scale misses: body composition shifts, fat redistribution, visible differences that accumulate gradually. Objective evidence against “nothing is changing.” This companion covers why the scale isn’t enough, what photos capture, how to do it effectively, and the motivation function. (4 min read)


  • The Self-Punishment

    Punishment through restriction after overeating can feed a binge-restrict cycle that makes things worse. Polivy and Herman argued that restriction produces a cognitively controlled way of eating that is vulnerable to collapse, and that breaking the rule brings overeating rather than a small lapse. That is a model of restraint rather than a demonstrated result. The restriction isn’t penance; it may be setup for the next binge. Breaking the cycle starts with responding to overeating with normalcy, not punishment. This companion covers the binge-restrict cycle, why restriction may backfire, the punishment instinct, and the alternative. (3 min read)


  • The Comfort Zone

    You’ve reached a comfortable weight but not your goal weight. Comfort is seductive: urgency fades, easy gains are captured, external pressure diminishes. Research by Locke and Latham on goal setting shows meaningful goals drive continued effort, and specific demanding goals outperform vague ones. Is your original goal still meaningful, or should it be revised? If you decide to press on, start with monitoring: across 138 randomized studies, getting people to track progress raised goal attainment, and it worked better when results were reported to someone and written down. This companion covers why comfort emerges, comfort as trap versus completion, the…


  • The External Validation Need

    External validation is unreliable fuel: people don’t always notice, comments taper off, visible progress slows. Deci and Ryan’s self-determination work holds that internal motivation is more durable than external reward and that external rewards can undermine the internal kind; in weight management specifically, financial incentives produce benefits that wane precipitously over time. Connect your eating to your own values, measure what matters to you, find satisfaction in the process. This companion covers why external validation is fragile, building internal motivation, identity over validation, and what to do when the compliments stop coming. (4 min read)


  • The Overthinking Trap

    Overthinking can wear you out when every meal is a decision. The familiar explanation is decision fatigue, a model that has not settled, but the fix does not depend on which way it lands. The solution: fewer decisions, not better deliberation. Create defaults, rules, routines. Eat the same breakfast. Have go-to meals. Define foods as “always,” “never,” or “sometimes,” with the caveat that total elimination suits people who do better abstaining and can backfire for people who do better with controlled amounts. Among long-term maintainers, reporting the same diet on weekdays and weekends went with being about 1.5 times more…


  • The Yo-Yo Pattern

    You’ve lost and regained the same weight before: something about the approach was unsustainable. Across 29 long-term studies, more than half of lost weight came back within two years and over 80% by five, and Fothergill’s Biggest Loser follow-up found a metabolic adaptation of about 499 calories a day still present six years later. Worth knowing before the rest: in the Diabetes Prevention Program a 7% loss cut diabetes incidence by 58% even though half the weight came back. Was it too restrictive? Did it rely on willpower alone? Was it temporary? This time must be different: sustainability from day…

Known defects on this page: