365 Changes

Author: Craig Constantine

  • The Plateau Question

    When weight loss stalls despite consistent eating, examine sleep, stress, and movement before touching your food intake. Poor sleep disrupts hunger hormones; chronic stress elevates cortisol, promoting fat storage; and NEAT (non-exercise activity) affects total energy expenditure more than most realize—lean individuals move about 2.5 hours more per day than obese individuals. This companion explores each factor in depth, the research behind them, and the three-question check to run before adjusting your diet. (4 min read)

  • Sugar’s Double Hit

    Table sugar is half glucose, half fructose—and your body handles them completely differently. Glucose goes everywhere, regulated by insulin. Fructose goes primarily to the liver, bypasses insulin, and readily converts to fat. Studies show fructose rapidly increases liver fat when substituted for other carbohydrates at equal calories. This companion explores what glucose does, what fructose does, why the combination is worse than either alone, and why whole fruit is metabolically different from added sugar. (4 min read)

  • The 3pm Urge

    The 3pm urge isn’t about food—it’s about stimulation. Boredom is an aversive state, and eating is a reliable way to make it stop temporarily. Research shows boredom triggers more non-hungry eating than anxiety or sadness, and bored people specifically gravitate toward unhealthy snacks for the excitement, not nutrition. This companion explores why boredom drives eating, the afternoon vulnerability (circadian dip, decision fatigue, habit loops), what to do instead of eating, and the diagnostic question that separates hunger from situational craving. (3 min read)

  • The Peanut Butter Jar

    Most commercial peanut butters contain added sugar and hydrogenated oils— turning a whole food into a processed product. Research by Mozaffarian linked trans fats to cardiovascular disease. Monteiro’s work on ultra-processed foods applies directly: the ingredients should be “peanuts” and possibly “salt.” Nothing else is necessary. Sugar makes it sweeter; hydrogenated oils prevent separation but add trans fats. This companion covers the ingredients check, why extras are added, the oil separation “problem,” calorie reality, other nut butters, and making the switch. (4 min read)

  • Ancestor Test

    If the answer to either question is no, you’re probably eating something your body wasn’t designed to process regularly. This isn’t about romanticizing the past—it’s a quick heuristic for identifying modern foods that exploit your biology. Your great-great-grandmother’s diet wasn’t perfect, but it didn’t include engineered products designed to override your satiety signals. This companion explores the logic of the test, what passes and what fails, the daily access question, the evolutionary mismatch, and what this doesn’t mean. (5 min read)

  • The All-or-Nothing Trap

    This is the “what-the-hell effect”—one slip interpreted as total failure, licensing continued deviation. The thinking is wrong because one cookie and ten cookies are not the same. One hour outside your eating window and six hours outside are not the same. A stumble isn’t a fall unless you decide it is. The damage from the initial slip is minor; the damage from everything that follows is the real problem. This companion explores how the what-the-hell effect works, the math that doesn’t support it, why the thinking happens, the correct response, the reset mindset, and building resilience. (5 min read)

  • The Long View

    The person you’re becoming doesn’t white-knuckle through every meal or fight constant battles with food. They’ve internalized patterns that feel natural. They eat foods that satisfy them, spend evenings doing things other than snacking, and feel comfortable in their body—not because they achieved some perfect state, but because their daily life aligns with their values. This companion explores why the long view matters, what that future self eats, how they spend evenings, how they feel in their body, and how to close the gap through small repeated actions. (4 min read)

  • The Non-Snacker

    The non-snacker doesn’t deliberate. The urge arrives and passes through without landing—not because of heroic restraint, but because snacking isn’t something they do. The decision was made upstream, at the level of identity. Research shows “I don’t” is significantly more effective than “I can’t” because it implies choice rather than deprivation. This companion explores why identity precedes behavior, the power of empowered refusal, what the non-snacker mindset looks like in practice, and how to become someone who simply doesn’t snack. (3 min read)

  • The Pantry Test

    Whatever is at eye level in your pantry is what you’re most likely to eat. This isn’t willpower—it’s how the brain makes decisions. Visible, convenient food gets eaten more than food that’s hidden or requires effort. A 2019 Cochrane review found that even small distances—20 cm versus 70 cm—meaningfully changed consumption, and the effect operates nonconsciously. This companion explores why eye level matters, the research on proximity and visibility, how to redesign your pantry so the automatic grab zone works for you, and the role of opacity in reducing impulse cues. (3 min read)

  • The Weekend Slide

    Weekends remove the external structure that weekdays provide. Your schedule, environment, and social context all change—and with them, the cues that support your weekday eating patterns. The problem isn’t willpower. The problem is that you’ve been relying on weekday scaffolding without realizing it. This companion explores why weekdays work (fixed schedule, limited access, public accountability), why weekends fail (unstructured time, full kitchen access, relaxation mindset), diagnostic questions, and how to build weekend structure. (4 min read)